| So you've struggled, labored, sweated and poured lots | | | | vitamin C, name that page with a searched for |
| of love into designing and building your website. And | | | | keyword or phrase pertaining to the benefits of vitamin |
| phewee ain't it just the pertiest thing for sore eyes! But | | | | C; e.g., vitamincbenefits.htm. So how do you know |
| just as in real, life so goes it for the virtual | | | | which keywords are regularly searched for? Don't |
| realm--beauty will only get you so far. So you've got to | | | | worry at the end of this article you'll be supplied with a |
| put that site to work! And how do you do that? Get it | | | | list of great and free keyword search tools. |
| out there...put it right in the bulls eye of the search | | | | Nobody gets to see the name of your file other than |
| engines! That's the way you're going to get traffic to | | | | you the webmaster and the various search engine |
| your site. And just in case you don't know, traffic | | | | robots. So it doesn't matter how awkward they look |
| (specifically targeted traffic) is the life blood of any | | | | or sound because unlike people a search engine robot |
| internet business. | | | | is not concerned with the aesthetics of a thing. |
| By the close of 2005 the big kahuna, the absolute | | | | KEYWORD DENSITY VERSUS CONTENT |
| capo di tutti frutti of search was Google which | | | | While making your webpage as attractive as possible |
| commanded a whopping 46-47 percent of all | | | | to the search engines bear in mind you're doing this to |
| searches conducted online. The runner up was Yahoo | | | | get traffic...human traffic. So the content (copy) on |
| with about 25 % and followed distantly by MSN who | | | | your pages should read attractively to your human |
| conducted about 11.4 % of all searches. AOL boasted | | | | visitors while also appealing to the search engine |
| a paltry 6.9 % which still came to a not insubstantial | | | | robots. In this respect keyword optimization is a fine |
| 350 million searches. Searches through Google were a | | | | balancing act and if push ever comes to shove you'd |
| mind-sweltering 2.4 billion! Contrastingly MSN is the king | | | | be better off weighing this balance in favor of your |
| of super-fast indexing whilst Google is the snail in the | | | | human visitors. After all what's the point of having a |
| site-indexing race. Yahoo once again falls in the middle | | | | ton of traffic passing through your site and hardly any |
| of the two. So bear in mind, if your site is new and | | | | of it performing your most desired action (visitors |
| you're optimizing for Google don't forget about the | | | | buying something, signing up etc) all because of that |
| other Big Two search engines (Yahoo and MSN) | | | | lousy copy you wrote with the search engine robots |
| which can send some rather decent traffic your way | | | | foremost in mind! |
| in the meanwhile. | | | | OVER-OPTIMIZATION |
| There are two types of optimization techniques that | | | | There are also other very important factors to |
| will determine your website's standing with the search | | | | consider when optimizing for keywords. How many |
| engines. They are: On-Page Search Optimization and | | | | keywords (phrases) should you consider for a given |
| Off-Page Search Optimization. This article will give you | | | | page and how many times should that/those words |
| pointers on On-Page Optimization. | | | | appear on that page. Okay, the first thing that you |
| ON-PAGE SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMAZATION OF | | | | have to understand is that there is such a thing as a |
| YOUR SITE | | | | website being Over-Optimized! You may believe that |
| KEYWORDS | | | | the greater the optimization the better but the reality is |
| The first thing you must learn to do is to treat each | | | | more complicated. You see the search engine |
| webpage on your site as (if not quite independent) an | | | | algorithms take into account the keyword density of a |
| autonomous entity. In essence this means a different | | | | particular page, and by doing in-depth analyses of the |
| title for each page and targeting different keywords | | | | topmost websites for a given keyword (for Google, |
| for a particular page. Let's say for example your site is | | | | speculation puts the ideal keyword density at between |
| about vitamins and has a number of different pages | | | | 1.5 - 1.8 % while MSN runs up to 3.0 %, with consistent |
| for the various vitamins. Your home page (index page) | | | | ole Yahoo somewhere in the middle) they will know |
| would target general keywords such as vitamin, health | | | | that something just isn't right if your website boasts a |
| supplement, dietary supplement, food vitamin etc. But a | | | | keyword density of 10%. This is know as spamming |
| page with content about vitamin C should not target | | | | the search engines and sends up an immediate red |
| such generalized terms. It should target keywords | | | | flag alert. |
| (phrases) specifically related to vitamin c such as: | | | | So what's the big deal? Your site won't get the ranking |
| vitamin c, c vitamin, ascorbic acid, benefit of vitamin c | | | | it perhaps deserves if it's new, and if it is an |
| and so on. The title of each particular page should | | | | established site it will most likely be taken down a |
| begin with your most valued (most searched for) | | | | notch or two. Another factor to consider if your site is |
| keyword. Once again using vitamin C as an example, | | | | new, is that Google routinely sequesters new sites (a |
| your webpage title should begin with Vitamin C and not | | | | process called sandboxing) until the site can establish |
| something like 'All the facts about vitamin c'. If you | | | | value and credibility. This is all part of the on-going |
| actually design and construct your website from | | | | battle between search engines (trying to deliver |
| scratch you can even go a step further. Name your | | | | valuable and worthwhile information to search queries) |
| webpage files starting with the targeted keyword. | | | | and the spam websites that offer no substantial value |
| Once again, taking your vitamin site as an example, for | | | | whatsoever, but are keyword dense one-page |
| pages relevant to vitamin C, name them accordingly. | | | | websites with the sole goal of making money online in |
| So say one of the pages is about the benefits of | | | | some manner or other. |