The High-tech Manpower Shortage: Real or Mythical?

Back in the 90s, most Americans would have agreedone programmer can do the work of another, simply
that the country needed more engineers andbecause they both know how to produce code.
programmers. The USA needed high-tech workers inI speak from personal experience. During the recent
order to maintain its worldwide edge in technology, andemployment bust, I was working for a robotics
common wisdom dictated that there jus weren’tcompany in Silicon Valley, where I was involved in
enough of them to go around.evaluating prospective job candidates. Despite the
As the years went by, the popular sentiment startedlarge number of available programmers out there, we
to change. This was especially true after the loominghad an extremely difficult time finding anyone who had
Y2K threat fizzled out, after the Internet bubble burst,the right skills. We weren’t looking for a perfect
and after the 9/11 tragedy forced many high-tech USmatch, mind you; just somebody who was close
companies to perform massive layoffs. Amongenough. The best candidates were usually foreign-born,
engineers and programmers, unemployment started toand few if any of them were US citizens. Additionally,
rise. So did resentment toward foreigners who werewhile the best candidates did have the right technical
alleged to have taken jobs away from hard-workingskills (or were close enough to what we needed), their
Americans. Whereas high-tech workers used toresumes and interviews often revealed inadequacies in
trumpet the need to recruit talented manpower fromother areas—-lackluster communication skills, for
overseas, many of them started to proclaim that thereexample.
were plenty of techies to go around, and that thisMind you, I’m not saying that American tech
manpower shortage was all a myth.workers are lacking in skills or qualifications. That would
Many Americans started blaming foreign workers,be an oversimplification as well. Rather, my argument is
particularly those who were employed on H-1B workthat we should avoid painting with a broad brush.
visas. This visa program allows workers in specializedDifferent companies have different needs, and some
categories—typically, science, engineering, andof them will have a hard time finding just the right
computer technology—to work in the USA on apeople. This is especially true of companies that are
temporary basis. Resentful techies protested thatpushing the envelope of high-tech development and
there was no manpower shortage, and thatwho need to recruit the most qualified people possible.
companies only wanted to hire foreigners becauseI’ve heard other experienced engineers make the
these people would be willing to work longer hours forsame observation. As one commentator said, “A
less pay.good programmer requires a lot of different skills.
So what’s the truth? When Americans technicalThese skills are developed in several ways: (1) a good
workers remain unemployed, does this mean that USbasic education, (2) experience, and (3) analytical
companies are passing them up in favor of cheapthinking. I haven’t met much people who combine
labor? Are there more than enough American techiesthese skills.” When a company isn’t just looking
to go around? Is the high-tech manpower shortagefor someone who can hammer out code – when
real, or is it all just hype?they need someone with strong analytical and
I think that the answer lies somewhere in between.problem-solving skills, for example, or who can develop
True, there are many programmers and engineersstrong software architectures – then the pool of
who have a hard time finding employment. It is alsopossible candidates can dwindle dramatically.
true that there are companies that deliberatelyThis problem is expecially obvious in strongly
underpay foreign workers. Does this mean that thecross-disciplinary fields. Suppose that you need
manpower shortage is mere fiction, though – nothingsomeone who can do circuit design, but who also has
but a ploy to justify the hiring of low-wage foreigners?some software development and mechanical design
Not necessarily. There are certainly unemployedskills. Such people are valuable in fields such as
techies out there – perhaps even an abundance ofrobotics, automation, and disk drive design, and they
them -- but this doesn’t mean that a company willcan be tough to find. When an American engineer is
have no problem finding the specific kind of personpassed up for jobs like these, it’s typically not
that they need. (It’s also worth considering that thebecause companies want cheap labor. Rather, it’s
unemployment rate among engineers has droppedbecause people with the right combination of skills can
considerably since the immediate post-9/11 era – butbe mighty difficult to find. That’s why companies
for the sake of argument, let’s assume thatare willing to recruit foreign nationals for these jobs,
unemployment is still a grave concern.)despite all the legal expenses and headaches involved.
Some people seem to think that a programmer is aSo is the manpower shortage real? In my judgment,
programmer, and that an engineer is an engineer. Theyyes and no. There are indeed times when foreigners
see companies choosing foreign nationals over USare hired because they’re willing to work for less.
citizens and they protest that these companies mustHowever, we should not be quick to conclude that
surely be looking for cheap labor. Mind you, there is nocompanies that hire foreign nationals are simply doing
doubt that some companies do operate in this fashion;so to save a buck. I’ve seen too many situations
however, we should not conclude that this is indeedwhere a company had a difficult time finding anybody
their motivation. People are like snowflakes, after all; nowho had the right skill set, even when there was no
two of them are alike. Engineers are notshortage of applicants.
interchangable, and it would be foolish to conclude that