Robotic Parking Garages Save Space But There is a Catch-22 - Energy Usage

It seems that robotic parking structures are the wavethat there actually is a robotic parking structure
of the future, and in many high-rent downtowncompany that is different; I wanted to correct a
business districts or high-rise apartment complexesmisconception. The automated garages built by
where space is at a premium and parking is absolutelyRobotic Parking Systems use NO hydraulics. Indeed, I
out of control when it comes to the cost, these roboticsee some benefits to this too, as when hydraulic lines
garages become the perfect solution. Still, todaybreak the fluid goes everywhere and ruins cars, so this
everyone is concerned about energy usage, andwould solve that issue, perhaps of interest?
everyone is trying to cut back, and become a more** Additional Update; The FATA Skyparks system
green company; thus, reducing their carbon footprint.does not utilize hydraulics either and there seems to
So, this presents a Catch-22 as the downtown areabe a tend occurring here. Martin Mattia writes; "many
real estate becomes more and more valuable, (aftersuppliers are moving away from hydraulics due to their
this current recessionary crisis in the commercial realperformance characteristics at various temperatures."
estate market) and the costs for parking become aAnd he also points out that regenerative energy
premium. However, one should also understand thatsystems, similar to the concept used in hybrid cars, is
robotic parking structures use a lot of hydraulics, andbecoming more common, although cost is a
therefore the energy usage, while it is significant, is notconsideration.
nearly as much if you might expect or believe it to be,The climate and temperature issue issue is quite a
at least on most of these systems.common problem. If you will recall in the aviation sector,
When shopping for robotic parking garages, equipment,the FAA changes the requirements for hydraulic fluid
and structures a company should ask lots of questionsdue to environmental concerns, but then nose landing
such as the energy use per the parking of eachgears were having issues. Remember those wheel
individual car and that should be divided by two,wells in aircraft get very cold and are not pressurized,
because retrieving the car also takes energy.see that issue with hydraulics? Also Sunlite Bus in the
However lifting a car up takes more energy, thenCalifornia desert was using Hydrogen Fuel cell buses
bringing it back down, and some robotic systems ofand ran into cooling issues with the already extremely
this type are engineered in such a way to savehot coverters. So, temperature does matter regardless
money (money = energy in this case) on the return trip.of industry; Martin's comments are indeed well
Therefore, if you are considering an automatic parkingfounded.
system of this type that is fully robotic, then you shouldAnd too his point I'd like to add a comment to the
shop around, and also consider the construction andregenerative braking systems, similar systems are
equipment costs amortized over a 20 year period,now being used at the Ports to offload containers,
then add in the estimated costs for energy, and dividewhich is saving vast amounts of energy considering
that up amongst the number of business days. Aftersome of these late model cargo ships have 20,000
you do that you'll have a better understanding of theplus containers on them, think about it. Robotic Parking
cost structure between the different types of unitsis innovating, and using what works.
available. Please consider all this.Why not consider robotic parking structures? It only
****Update: I am advised by Mary Lou DeWynGaert,makes sense.