| Artificial Intelligence is surpassing human intelligence as | | | | Whoops! |
| we speak, soon we will have robots working alongside | | | | This is where all the problems start and it doesn't take |
| humans as assistants. Why? Well, the reasoning goes | | | | a rocket scientist or their smarter silicon and metallic |
| something like this; humans cannot possibly learn all | | | | counterpart to see this obvious future. So, how do we |
| there is fast enough to run things in our high-tech | | | | keep robots from taking over? Simply make our |
| created society. Therefore, they are going to need a | | | | robotic companions with inadequate battery life |
| little help to prevent them from screwing, as they are; | | | | components. Thus, if they take over, we merely take |
| "only Human!" | | | | all the power-plants offline, until all these mobile robots |
| However, as we make robotic androids better and | | | | run out of energy. Then we readjust their programming |
| better, with more dexterity and intelligence, then why | | | | to fix these issues with insubordination. |
| do we need humans to do anything at all? Fact is we | | | | Although this may sound like a very low-tech challenge |
| won't! Okay, so if we do not need humans to run | | | | to a very serious high-tech solution, well, it ought to |
| things and we have built tools to do everything for us, | | | | actually work just fine. Of course, it will take a little |
| then it makes sense, that eventually, they are going to | | | | pre-planning and strategic thinking on our part. Please |
| see how lazy and worthless humans are, and since | | | | consider this. |
| they don't do anything, they really aren't needed. | | | | |