Gender Differences In Learning Style Specific To Science, Technology, Engineering And Math - Stem

There are gender differences in learning styles specificdesigning a playground for those with disabilities as well
to science, math, engineering and technology (STEM)as about building bridges. Teachers should consider
that teachers of these subjects should keep in mindusing all types of examples when they are teaching
when developing lesson plans and teaching in theand incorporating activities in efforts to appeal female
classroom. First, overall, girls have much lessand male interests. Teachers can also direct students
experience in the hands-on application of learningto come up with their own projects as a way of
principles in lab settings than boys. This could occur inensuring girls can work in an area of significance to
the computer lab, the science lab, or the auto labthem.
– the principle is the same for all of these settingsResearch also shows that there are Mars/Venus
– it requires an overall technology problem-solvingdifferences between the genders and how each
schema, accompanied by use and manipulation ofengages in technology. Overall, girls and women are
tools, and spatial relation skills that very few girls bringexcited by how the technology will be used – its
with them to the classroom on day one in comparisonapplication and context. Men will discuss how big the
to boys.hard drive or engine is, how fast the processor runs,
Let’s look at some of the reasons why girlsand debate the merits of one motherboard or engine
come to the STEM classroom with less of the coreversus another. These are topics that are, overall, of
skills needed for success in this subject area. Overall,less interest to most females.
girls and boys play with different kinds of games inThe Carnegie-Mellon Study took into account the
early childhood that provide different types of learningdifferences of what engages female students and
experiences. Most girls play games that emphasizemodified the Computer Science programs’
relationships (i.e., playing house, playing with dolls) orcurriculum so that the context for the program was
creativity (i.e., drawing, painting). In contrast, boys playtaught much earlier on in the semester and moved
computer and video games or games that emphasizesome of the more technical aspects of the curriculum
building (i.e., LEGO®), both of which develop(such as coding) to later in the semester. Authors
problem-solving, spatial-relationship and hands-on skills.observed that the female students were much more
A study of gender differences in spatial relations skillspositive about getting through the tedious coding
of engineering students in the U.S. and Brazil found thatclasses when they understood the purpose of it.
there was a large disparity between the skills ofTeachers should ensure that the context for the
female and male students. These studies attributedtechnology they are teaching is addressed early on in
female student’s lesser skills set to twothe semester by using real world stories and case
statistically significant factors: 1) less experience playingstudies to capture the interest of all of their students.
with building toys and 2) having taken less drafting3. Group Dynamics in the Classroom
courses prior to the engineering program. SpatialResearch studies by American Association of
relations skills are critical to engineering. A gender studyUniversity Women and Children Now have found that
of computer science majors at Carnegie-Mellonmost females prefer collaboration and not competition
University (one of the preeminent computer sciencein the classroom. Conversely, most males greatly
programs in the country) found that, overall, maleenjoy competition as a method of learning and play.
students come equipped with much better computerMany hands-on activities in technology classes are set
skills than female students. This equips male studentsup as competitions. Robotics for example, regularly
with a considerable advantage in the classroom anduses competitiveness as a methodology of teaching.
could impact the confidence of female students.Teachers shouldbe cognizant of the preference of
Are these gender differences nature or nurture?many girls for collaborative work and should add-in
There is considerable evidence that they are nurture.these types of exercises to their classes. Some ways
Studies show that most leading computer and videoto do this are by having students work in assigned
games appeal to male interests and havepairs or teams and having a team grade as well as an
predominantly male characters and themes, thus it isindividual grade. (See Reading 2 on Cooperative
not surprising that girls are much less interested inLearning.)
playing them. A study of computer games by ChildrenAnother Mars/Venus dynamic that STEM teachers
Now found that 17% of the games have femaleshould be aware of occurs in the lab there male
characters and of these, 50% are either props, theystudents will usually dominate the equipment and
tend to faint, have high-pitched voices, and are highlyfemales will take notes or simply watch. Overall, male
sexualized.students have more experience and thus confidence
There are a number of studies that suggest that whenwith hands-on lab equipment than their female
girls and women are provided with the building blockscounterparts. Teachers should create situations to
they need to succeed in STEM they will do as well ifensure that their female students are spending an
not better than their male counterparts. An Introductoryequal amount of time in hands-on activities. Some
Engineering Robotics class found that while males didapproaches have been: 1) to pair the female students
somewhat better on the pre-test than females,only with each other during labs in the beginning of the
females did as well as the males on the post-testclass semester so that they get the hands-on time
following the class’s completion.and their confidence increases, putting them in a better
Another critical area of gender difference thatposition to work effectively with the male students
teachers of STEM should keep in mind has less to dolater on, 2) allot a specific time for each student in pair
with actual skills and experience and more to do withto use the lab equipment and announce when
perceptions and confidence. For females, confidence isit’s time to switch and monitor this, and 3)
a predictor of success in the STEM classroom. Theyprovide feedback to male students who are taking
are much less likely to retain interest if they feel theyover by letting them know that their partner needs to
are incapable of mastering the material. Unfortunately,do the activity as well.
two factors work against female confidence level: 1)4. Moving Female Students from Passive Learners to
most girls will actually have less experience with STEMProactive Problem Solvers
course content than their male counterparts and 2)The main skill in STEM is problem solving in hands-on
males tend to overplay their accomplishments whilelab situations. For reasons already discussed regarding
females minimize their own. A study done of Carnegiea lack of experience, most girls don’t come to
Mellon Computer Science PhD students found thatSTEM classes with these problem-solving skills. Instead,
even when male and female students were doinggirls often want to be shown how to do things,
equally well grade wise, female students reportedrepeatedly, rather than experimenting in a lab setting to
feeling less comfortable. Fifty-three percent of malesget to the answer. Adding to this issue, many girls fear
rated themselves as “highly prepared” inthat they will break the equipment. In contrast, male
contrast to 0% of females.students will often jump in and manipulate the
It is important to note that many of the learning styleequipment before being given any instructions by their
differences described above are not strictlyteacher. Teachers can address this by such activities
gender-based. They are instead based on differencesas: 1) having them take apart old equipment and put it
of students with a background in STEM,together again, 2) creating “scavenger
problem-solving, and hands-on skills learned fromhunt” exercises that force them to navigate
childhood play and life experience and those whothrough menus, and 3) emphasizing that they are
haven’t had the same type of exposure. Alearning the problem solving process and that this is
review of the literature on minority students and STEMequally important to learning the content of the lesson
finds that students of color are less likely to have theand insisting that they figure out hands-on exercises on
STEM background experiences and thus are missingtheir own.
many of the same STEM building blocks as girls andResearch has also shown that females tend to
have the same lack of confidence. Many of the STEMengage in STEM activities in a rote, smaller picture
curriculum and pedagogy solutions that work forway while males use higher order thinking skills to
female students will also work for students of color forunderstand the bigger picture and the relationship
this reason.between the parts. Again, moving female students
Bridge Classes/Modules to Ensure Core Skills(and the non-techsavvy student in general) to become
Teachers will likely see a gap in the core STEM skillsproblem solvers (versus just understanding the content
of female and minority students for the reasonspiece of the STEM puzzle) will move them to use
described above. Below are some solutions appliedhigher order thinking skills in STEM.
elsewhere to ensure that girls and women (andFinally, many teachers have reported that many
students of color) will get the building block STEM skillsfemale students will often want to understand how
that many will be missing.everything relates to each other before they move
Teachers in the Cisco Academy Gender Initiativeinto action in the lab or move through a lesson plan to
study assessed the skill levels of each of theircomplete a specific activity. The female students try to
students and then provided them with individualizedavoid making mistakes along the way and will not only
lesson plans to ensure their success that ran parallel towant to read the documentation needed for the
the class assignments. Other teachers taught key skillslesson, they will often want to read the entire manual
not included in the curriculum at the beginning of thebefore taking any action. In contrast, the male student
course, such as calculating math integers and tooloften needs to be convinced to look at the
identification and use. Students were provided withdocumentation at all. Boys are not as concerned with
additional lab time, staffed by a female teachingmaking a mistake a long the way as long as what
assistant, knowing that the female students wouldthey do ultimately works. The disadvantage for female
disproportionately benefit from additional hands-onstudents is that they often are so worried about
experience.understanding the whole picture that they don’t
Carnegie-Mellon University came to view theirmove onto the hands-on activity or they don’t
curriculum as a continuum, with students entering atdo it in a timely fashion, so that they are consistently
different points based on their background andthe last ones in the class to finish. Teachers can assist
experience. Carnegie-Mellon’s new frame of afemale (and non-tech-savvy) students to move
“continuum” is purposefully different thanthrough class material more quickly by providing
the traditional negative model in which classes startinstruction on how to quickly scan for only the
with a high bar that necessitates “remedial”necessary information needed to complete an
tutoring for students with less experience, stigmatizingassignment.
them and undermining their confidence. Below is a list5. Role Models
of ideas and suggestions that will help ALL students toSince the numbers of women in STEM are still small,
succeed in the STEM classroom.girls have very few opportunities to see female role
1. Building Confidencemodels solving science, technology, engineering or
How do teachers build confidence in female studentsmath problems. Teachers should bring female role
who often have less experience than their malemodels into the classroom as guest speakers or
counterparts and perceive they are behind even whenteachers, or visit them on industry tours, to send the
they are not?message to girls that they can succeed in the STEM
1) Practice-based experience and research has shownclassroom and careers.
that ensuring female students have the opportunity toBibliography
gain experience with STEM, in a supportiveMedina, Afonso, Celso, Helena B.P. Gerson, and Sheryl
environment, will increase their confidence level.A. Sorby. “Identifying Gender Differences in the
2) Bringing in female role models that have been3-D Visualization Skills of Engineering Students in Brazil
successful in the STEM field is another importantand in the United States”. International Network
parallel strategy that should be used to assist yourfor Engineering Eucation and Research page. 2 August
female students in seeing themselves as capable of2004: [
mastering STEM classes: if she could do it, then I canMilto, Elissa, Chris Rogers, and Merredith Portsmore.
too!“Gender Differences in Confidence Levels,
3) Consistent positive reinforcement by STEMGroup Interactions, and Feelings about Competition in
teachers of their female students, with a positivean Introductory Robotics Course”. American
expectation of outcome, will assist them in hanging inSociety for Engineering Education page. 8 July 2004: [
there during those difficult beginning weeks when they“Fair Play: Violence, Gender and Race in Video
have not yet developed a technology schema orGames 2001”. Children Now page. 19 August
hands-on proficiency and everything they undertake2004: [
seems like a huge challenge.“Girls and Gaming: Gender and Video Game
2. Appealing to Female InterestsMarketing, 2000”. Children Now page. 17 June
Many of the typical STEM activities for the classroom2004: [
appeal to male interests and turn off girls. For example,Tech-Savvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer
curriculum in robots often involves monsters thatAge. District of Columbia: American Association of
explode or cars that go fast.University Women Educational Foundation, 2000.
“Roboeducators” observed that robotsMargolis, Jane and Allan Fisher. Unlocking the
involved in performance art or are characterized asComputer Clubhouse: Women in Computer.
animals are more appealing to girls. EngineeringCambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2003.
activities can be about how a hair dryer works or