Artificial Intelligence and Human Recognition Mirroring Errors

Today we are building robots and computers, whicha dumb human bluffing or BS'ing their way through a
mirror humans and can interact with them. This workssubject matter or the software gives its self away by
very well for many things and can assist humans inacting non-human and providing erroneous or irrelevant
accepting their computer or robotic assistantdata to a conversation, story or paper. It maybe
counterparts. Unfortunately when computers attemptfanciful to a human to use a robotic or computer
to decipher text and meaning and then correspondsoftware enhanced correspondence mechanism to
with humans, the mirroring does not always work.save time, do homework, save labor costs or
If the robot or computer is using artificial intelligenttaxpayers money. But if such an artificial intelligent
software to communicate with a human and usesystem delivers garbage due to shoddy programming
mirroring techniques and scaling of escalation in theand less than intelligent people putting in the input, then it
conversation, they often will not suffice in keeping thewill not suffice or solve the problem of tricking the
human's interest for too long. Indeed a chimpanzee,individual, enhancing readership or convincing anyone of
dog or cat maybe willing to continue interaction,anything.
non-verbal communication or synthesize mimickingSo, we must remember that those who program
techniques for verbal communication; however forthese systems to interact with humans need to be as
humans it cannot work for very long especially if thesmart or smarter (artificially that is) than the human
human is in search of enlightenment, rather thanthey are corresponding to, other wise the human feels
encyclopedia or dictionary definitional content.that the discussion is irrelevant, rhetoric or simply
In corresponding with artificial intelligence on amirroring semantics. If we are to build assistant robots,
keyboard or through the Internet the human assumesthey must be careful with their interactions. Now,
that the entity on the other side is like them; that is tosometimes humans act in such was, yet when they
say an organic carbon based human biped. Theredo, don't most people simply walk away, shaking their
comes a time when the human is skeptical of theheads? If a human stops the correspondence then
information and correspondence coming from theyou have to start all over. If the human rejects the
other side of the screen, often the human will begin torobotic assistant then you have wasted your money in
assume that the information comes from an ignorantthat system. Sure you can say it is work in progress
human or a lawyer'esque type human and thus doesand call it development costs, but it is a useless hunk
not appreciate the information for what it is; pureof junk you see? Likewise if a student uses a system
information mixed in with mirroring conversationalfor their work and if the professor of the homework
composites of chit chat crap.assignment is unimpressed you get a lousy grade.
There are many types of software used today toRight now this is what I am giving the artificial
help un-intelligent humans with correspondence, writingintelligence programmers right now. Y'all need to go
or even term papers, yet what you will find is thisback to the drawing board and do some more
software does not work well when the human beingresearch on the human species within a society and
used as the target subject actually knows a little aboutstudy how they interact in groups, one on one and in
a lot of things or is intimately familiar with the subjectthe larger over all culture. It is not a one size fits all
matter. For instance in the case of the CIA or NSAscenario and although it is indeed smart to try to keep
trying to get information of profile a target; a professorit simple, there needs to be more overlay on the
grading a term paper or a reader of a news article. Sovarious types of people and smarter people doing the
often it is obvious that the what appears at first to beprogramming.